[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing and Abstracting



Sport Injury and Corrective Exercise Association

Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Peer Review Process ::
 | Post date: 2022/05/13 | 
The Journal of Sports Injury Prevention & Biomechanics (JSIPB) employs a double-blind peer review process implying both reviewer and author identities are concealed from each other. Upon receiving a new manuscript, the Editor-in-Chief briefly reviews the manuscript to verify its conformity with the journal’s aims, scope, and style guidelines. If it is initially accepted, the manuscript will be placed in a queue for being refereed by at least two reviewers.
Editor in Chief reviews the comments of the editors and reviewers and makes a decision that may be: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. It is unusual for an article to be accepted with no revision at this step. If a revision is requested, the reviewers' comments will be sent to the authors for point by point response and revision of the article.
The whole review process depends on receiving referees' comments and revising the manuscripts by the author based on these comments and may take 3 to 5 months. Upon receipt of the revised article from the author and after final approval by referees, the final decision will be done by the editor-in-chief and a notification letter will be sent to the corresponding author.
The following diagram shows the peer-review workflow in detail.

View: 353 Time(s)   |   Print: 100 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
)Journal of Sport Injury Prevention and Biomechanics Journal of Sport Injury Prevention and Biomechanics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4642